All Issue

2018 Vol.63, Issue 3 Preview Page
September 2018. pp. 196-204

The main objective of this study was to identify the best quality rice for cultivation on reclaimed land in Jeollabukdo-Province based on yield, head rice ratio, protein content, amylose content, and Toyo taste value evaluations. Seven varieties of rice were grown for two years on the reclaimed land. The Sukwang variety had the earliest heading date. The tiller number for the Younghojinmi variety was 19 on average, and its variation in tiller number was the lowest, which showed that the safety for cultivation of the variety was high on the reclaimed land with respect to that of the other varieties. The culm and panicle lengths of the Sukwang and Hyunpum varieties were the highest at 81.8 and 21.3 ㎝, respectively. Shindongjin produced the highest thousand grain weight at 27.7 g, whereas Haepum produced the lowest at 22.3 g. The number of grains per panicle for 7 all varieties was statistically equal for both years. The yield order for the varieties was Shindongjin (590) > Hopum (575) > Younghojinmi (552) > Sukwang (551) > Hopum (543) > Mipum (534) > Haepum (498 kg/10a), which showed that there was no significant difference in average yield between the varieties when both years are taken into consideration. However, the annual difference in Haepum yield between 2015 and 2016 was the highest at 108 kg/10a, indicating low cultivation safety. The head rice ratio of Younghojinmi was higher than for the other cultivars in both 2015 and 2016. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 years when the averages for all varieties were analyzed. There was was a considerable difference in protein and amylose content between the varieties in the two years, although this was not apparent in the results when the average over 2 years for each variety was calculated. There was no significant difference between the two years with respect to the average head rice ratio, and the protein and amylose contents of the seven varieties. The Toyo taste values for the Sukwang and Mipum varieties were higher than for the other varieties. Based on the principle characteristics, such as Toyo value, the Sukwang variety is a suitable substitute for Shindongjin, which has been previously used to produce high-quality rice on the reclaimed land.

  1. Back, N. H., K. M. Cho, C. H. Yang, P. Shin, T. H. Noh, G. H. Lee, and K. H. Park. 2014. Research on adaptability of major varieties for whole crop silage rice to wet seeding in newly reclaimed tidal land. Korean J. Int. Agric. 26(3) : 258-261.10.12719/KSIA.2014.26.3.258
  2. Cha, K. H., H. J. Oh, H. G. Park, K. N. An, and W. J. Jung. 2014. Comparison of growth, yield and quality disease occurrence with different rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars in organic cultivation. Agricultural Science & Technology Research. 49 : 27-32.
  3. Chaum, S., H. P. Singh, T. Samphumphuang, and C. Kirdmanee. 2012. Calcium-alleviated salt tolerance in indica rice (Oryza sativa L. spp. indica): physiological and morphological changes. AJCS. 6(1) : 176-182.
  4. Cho, Y. I. and H. J. Koh. 2007. Physiological nitrogen use efficiency and agronomic characters of breeding lines in rice. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 39(1) : 33-38.
  5. Chung, N. J., J. H. Park, K. J. Kim, and J. K. Kim. 2005. Effect of head rice ratio on rice palatability. Korean J. Crop Sci. 50(S) : 29-32.
  6. Hong, H. C., C. Y. Chung, and K. J. Kim. 2004. Palatability assessment. Korean J. Crop Sci. 9(S1) : 284-294.
  7. Hwang, H. G. 1994. Classification of rice varieties based on the physicochemical properties related with grain quality of rice. J. Agri. Sci. 36(1) : 52-64.
  8. Jeonbuk Agricultural Research and Extension Services. 2016. A survey result of cultivation area according to rice variety in 2017. pp. 1-2.
  9. Khatun, S. and T. J. Flowers. 1995. Effects of salinity on seed set in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 18 : 7.10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00544.x
  10. Kim, C. E., M. Y. Kang, and M. H. Kim. 2012. Comparison of properties affecting the palatability of 33 commercial brands of rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 57(3): 301-309.10.7740/kjcs.2012.57.3.301
  11. Kim, H, J., G. R. Kim, H. N. Woo, S. H. Park, J. H. Shin, Y. C. Choi, and D. Y. Chung. 2011. Properties and fate of nitrogen in a reclaimed tidal soil. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science. 38(2) : 301-307.
  12. Kim, J. H. 2010b. A direction of policy on rice in Korea. The Korean Society of Food Preservation. 9(2) : 3-8.
  13. Kim, K. H. and H. K. Joo. 1990. Variation of grain quality of rice varieties grown at different locations(I). Locational variation of quality-related characteristics of rice grain. Korean J. Crop Sci. 35(1) : 34-43.
  14. Kim, D. K., M. K. Choi, K. D. Lee, M. G. Baek, B. I. Ku, S. G. Kang, H. K. Park, and B. K. Kim. 2012. Growth and yield of rice in levels of nitrogen and water management of reclaimed saline soil in southwestern area. Korean J. Crop Sci. 57(3) : 203-208.10.7740/kjcs.2012.57.3.203
  15. Kim, Y. K. 2010a. A prospect and real condition of rice variety development in Korea. The Korean Society of Food Preservation. 9(2) : 75-85.
  16. Koo, J. W., J. K. Choi, and J. K. Son. 1998. Soil properties of reclaimed tidel lands and tidelands of western sea coast in Korea. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 31(2) : 120-127.
  17. Korea Rural Community Corporation. 1998, Study on the development of cultivation technique for upland crop through the improvement of salt exclusion method in the reclaimed land. pp. 26-27.
  18. Lee, I. S., D. R. Lee, S. H. Cho1, S. Y. Lee, K. C. Kim, K. K. Lee1, and Y. J. Song. 2016. Effects of different nitrogen levels and planting densities on the quality and yield of the black rice cultivar ‘Shinnongheugchal’. Korean J. Crop Sci. 61(2) : 79-86.10.7740/kjcs.2016.61.2.079
  19. Lee, J. I., K. Kim, J. C. Shin, E. H. Kim, M. H. Lee, and Y. J. Oh. 1996. Effects of ripening temperature on quality appearance and chemical quality characteristics of rice grain. J. Agri. Sci. 38(1) : 1-9.
  20. Maas, E. V. and K. K. Tanji. 1990. Crop salt tolerance. Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management Manual. ASCE Manuals & Reports on Engineering Practices. No 71. New York : 262p. 304.
  21. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2016. A press release on special control plan for rice inventory control. pp. 1-2.
  22. Rural Development Administration, National Crop Experiment Station. 2002. Strategy on brand and technique for safety production of high quality rice. pp. 7-8.
  23. Scardaci, S. C., M. C. Shannon, S. R. Grattan, A. U. Eke, S. R. Roberts, S. Goldman-Smith, and J. E. Hill. 2002. Water management practices can affect salinity in rice fields. California Agriculture 56(6) : 184-188.10.3733/ca.v056n06p184
  24. Seong, D. G., Y. G. Kim, Y. C. Cho, H. Y. Shin, M. C. Kim, S. I. Shim, J. I. Chung, S. H. Kim, C. S. Kim, and J. S. Chung. 2014. Selection of the proper rice varieties to early transplanting cultivation in southern plain of Korea. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science 48(6) : 1-9.10.14397/jals.2014.48.6.1
  25. Shim, K. M., K. A. Roh, K. H. So, G. Y. Kim, H. C. Jeong, and D. B. Lee. 2010. Assessing impacts of global warming on rice growth and production in Korea. Climate Change Research. 1(2) : 121-131.
  26. Shim, S. I., S. G. Lee, and B. H. Kang. 1998. Screening of saline tolerant plants and development of biological monitoring technique for saline stress. Ⅱ. Responses of emergence and early growth of several crop species to saline stress. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture. 17(2) : 122-126.
  27. Statistics Korea. 2017. Rice consumption survey.
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Crop Science
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국작물학회
  • Journal Title :The Korean Journal of Crop Science
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국작물학회지
  • Volume : 63
  • No :3
  • Pages :196-204
  • Received Date :2018. 04. 10
  • Accepted Date : 2018. 08. 12